Pak Lah has responded. Rather lamely if you ask me.
He has responded that the government had merely leased the aircraft from Penerbangan Malaysia Berhad.
Just for the record, Penerbangan Malaysia Berhad is owned by Khazanah Nasional - which, of course is government owned.
So what's the difference then? It's like saying something along the lines of "Oh my brother Ah Meng bought it with our combined family money, and we all get to use it, but it's not something I bought what?". Ok, maybe a little lame of a comparison, but you get my drift.
Also - "The jet is for use of the government, not the prime minister (only)," he told a news conference at the KL International Airport upon his return from London after having attended the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.
He thinks we stupid or what?
So now we have a new jet for him, some selected few from the government and probably the royal families to use? Wow! How nice!
I would also be very cautious about his words - I really doubt that apart from himself, others are really going to be using it much.
One should also think about the term lease here. According to wikipedia, leasing is:
"A lease or tenancy is the right to use or occupy personal property or real property given by a lessor to another person (usually called the lessee or tenant) for a fixed or indefinite period of time, whereby the lessee obtains exclusive possession of the property in return for paying the lessor a fixed or determinable consideration (payment)."
Most of the time, this regular payment will be higher than what you would pay upfront, so - let's think of it in another perspective.
The jet costs U$ 50 million, in the end this can end up costing the rakyat a few million extra, and of course, making some fella somewhere richer by a few.
In the first place, why wasn't this disclosed to the rakyat? I don't recall anything anywhere about using the national funds to pay for an Air Force One for the so called "government" and perhaps royalty to use for their enjoyment.
Where is your constantly emphasized transparency?
By all means Mr. PM, if I (and all of the bloggers who have written about this) are wrong, please correct us.